Wednesday, 22 February 2012

Deeper Learning Question #01

Deeper learning question: “How effective have the British Comedy films you have studied been at presenting ideas about British society and cultural values?”

This question is in reference to comparing two British Comedy films Notting Hill, and Attack the Block that we have studied in class. Whilst the two films are based in the city of London and both represent Britain to an audience, both films widely differ in the impression that they give.

In Notting Hill, Britain is represented through the popular ‘postcard Britain’ image of the picturesque, idyllic setting that overall our country is set upon showing to the rest of the world. After all it is this image that sets up our image on a purely tourism front. This image, fit with the charming, befuddling Hugh Grant character bodes well with the representation of Britain and our society.

Whereas Attack the Block features a far more negative representation of Britain. The film shows the poor side of London, with run-down council estates and the gang culture that resides here. To residents of Britain this is a well-known stereotype, but the film aids to stop that by ensuring that it is these kinds of people that end up being the heroes in this story. But if you look at the takings for the film it is evidently clear that a film like this does not appeal globally in comparison to films like Notting Hill and the middle-class Britain that is represents.

Although in some ways the films characters and locations are binary opposites of each other, they do share similarities in the form of their British values. Amongst both films a strong sense of cultural community. Hugh Grant’s character would be nothing without his friends, who are there for him, supporting him, in the main, key parts of the film. Likewise the ‘gang’ of youths in Attack the Block are a tight-knit group who stick together and defend one another throughout. 

Wednesday, 12 October 2011

The Social Network Synopsis.

One night in 2003, young Harvard undergrad Mark Zuckerberg, a computer programming genius, began to work on an idea.  What began in his dorm room became a revolution in social networking and communication, but not without its downfalls. Six years and 500 million friends later, the young entrepreneur’s success of ‘Facebook’ is met with the complications of his personal life; consumed by two major legal suits and a lot of friends lost.

Wednesday, 21 September 2011

My 15 Favourite Films (In No Particular Order)

So here are my top 15 favourite films. They're grouped by genre, but most of which are 'hybrid' multi-genre films, though. But I decided to group these into their main genres. I didn't quite realise how difficult it would be to think of fifteen films I liked enough to call my 'favourite', -some of which are childhood favourites- so I based it on films that I was happy to watch again and again. Although some of the films I would otherwise be 'ashamed' to say were my personal favourites, they are and I decided to include them. In the end I picked these:

DRAMA:
Memoirs of a Geisha, 2005, Director: Rob Marshall, Distributed By: Columbia Pictures, 
GENRE: DRAMA/ROMANCE

The Blind Side, 2009, Director: John Lee Hancock, Distributed by: Warner Bros,
GENRE: DRAMA

FANTASY:
Avatar, 2009, Director: James Cameron, Distributed by: 20th Century Fox, 
GENRE: SCI-FI/FANTASY

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, 2005, Director: Mike Newell, Distributed by: Warner Bros, 
GENRE: FANTASY/FAMILY/ADVENTURE

Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, 1971, Director: Mel Stuart, Distributed by: Paramount Pictures, GENRE: FAMILY/FANTASY/MUSICAL

Matilda, 1996, Director: Danny DeVito, Distributed by: TriStar Pictures, 
GENRE: FAMILY/FANTASY/COMEDY

Bruce Almighty, 2003, Director: Tom Shadyac, Distributed by: Universal Pictures, 
GENRE: COMEDY/FANTASY

CULT:
Fight Club, 1999, Director: David Fincher, Distributed by: 20th Century Fox, 
GENRE: CULT

ACTION:
Inception, 2010, Director: Christopher Nolan, Distributed by: Warner Bros, 
GENRE: ACTION/ADVENTURE/SCI-FI

The Dark Knight, 2008, Director: Christopher Nolan, Distributed by: Warner Bros, 
GENRE: SUPERHERO/ACTION/CRIME/THRILLER

X-Men, 2000, Director: Bryan Singer, Distributed by: 20th Century Fox & Marvel Entertainment, 
GENRE: ACTION/ADVENTURE/SCI-FI

Wanted, 2008, Director: Timur Bekmambetov, Distributed by: Universal Pictures, 
GENRE: ACTION/CRIME/THRILLER


COMEDY:
Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy, 2004, Director: Adam McKay, Distributed by: Dreamworks Pictures, GENRE: COMEDY/ROMANCE

ROM-COM:
The Proposal, 2009, Director: Anne Fletcher, Distributed by: Touchstone Pictures, 
GENRE:  ROM-COM/DRAMA(-according to IMDB)

ANIMATION:
Toy Story, 1995, Director: John Lasseter, Distributed by: Walt Disney Pictures, GENRE:      ANIMATION/FAMILY/COMEDY


Normally I would say that my favourite genre is probably fantasy/Sci-Fi, by this list it seems I have a wide-range of favourite genres, which is probably a good thing.
-Lauren

Sunday, 18 September 2011

Fright Night - Film Review

With the current trend for remakes, the 1985 teenage-horror ‘Fright Night’ has had a re-vamp. Should they have bothered?

The film is cleverly set on the outskirts of Las Vegas where the inhabitants work the Strip at night and sleep in the day which provides a prime location for a vampire to dwell.

The editing was cleverly done to create a good mix of suspense and tension with at least one scene where they intended to make the audience jump.

The performances made the film. Colin Farrell brought a slick, charming allure to his character Jerry and that he could be both the nice neighbour and menacing vampire. David Tennant was refreshing and full of humour as the Magician Peter Vincent, although a likeness to Russell Brand sprung to mind. Anton Yelchin’s Charley, the suburban teenager was medicocre but felt this was due to the way the character was written. I failed to connect with him and I cared more about whether Peter Vincent would live rather than Charley himself.

The 3D effects were feeble. The shots were all set from one-angle, and for the most part, the glasses were unnecessary. This effect also made the film so dark that in some scenes, you were straining to see. I recall only two or three shots where the 3D was noticeably used.  These were poor especially with the blood predictably shooting out of the screen.  

If you want to watch a cheesy vampire movie, you won’t be disappointed in Fright Night.